16
« on: April 17, 2013, 07:42:50 PM »
Alright, Im wary of posting here because its my character but I'd like to put my two cents in and this does not necessarily reflect the overall staff opinion.
First off, jokes are jokes. Sometimes they're funny, sometimes they're not. Just because they broke the fourth wall doesn't automatically mean that the joke isn't funny. However, jokes can be harmful to people and not everyone realizes the consequences of their actions. That doesn't mean that joking should be condemned.
As well, I should point out that Knowledge doesn't care about power. He's a hedonist, he doesn't want anything more to experience the universe. It would be out of character for him to use the techniques he knows to become an all-powerful uber-being that could destroy all of existence. Its simply not something that he would do. I recognize the concern for power abuse but people are limited to what is logical for the character to do.
As well, Knowledge has never been said to be hardly part of the game. He exists as a potential plot point, particularly with a plot with regards to the Revenge-Zarethian war that Unstellar and I have planned. So, he does have a plan, he does have a purpose. Even topics he was in that are not part of the Revenge-Zarethian war have some purpose that I have looked into as a way of explaining his place there. Usually he manipulates people to his own gains or for his amusement. After the Revenge-Zarethian War I plan on him being removed unless the staff think they can use him.
Orph actually has a good point. I honestly didn't think about it that way. (I believe my issue was how it was explained to me, I thought that he would be able to know about, well, EVERYTHING) However, the thing is that the fourth wall has been broken other times (namely by Orga with his character Sam) and that caused no conflict that I can remember. That being said, if most people are opposed to any fourth wall breaking then the staff will probably listen to such. Before this, the only incident I remember is when I called Hikaru the RPer out for not posting as a joke, which was wrong of me. That prompted the newer "only for a joke; don't abuse" clause. Either way I didn't realize it was such a big issue.
As to the claim that the staff are arrogant elitists, well, I believe that this is entirely false. The fact that you disagreed with staff opinion, which has always (to my knowledge) been the final decision for matters in the site does not make them elitist or arrogant. As well, the staff listen to majority opinion then make a decision that they believe is best for the site and canon, etc. For the remark regarding the minority treatment, well, I believe that if the minority is in opposition to the majority then the majority (in some cases) is right and the minority is wrong. I'll use myself for an example. If I believe that the powers of my embodiement Knowledge work one way, but the rest of the members don't then I am probably wrong. Probably. If I bring it to the staff I let the staff decide. If the staff decide that it is OP then its probably OP and I, the minority, am wrong. This may well be the case, as we shall probably see soon enough.
The fact that you made a disrespectful response was the reason K2 told you to watch your tone, and this has been done by other staff members trying to stop anything that may incite a growth in the argument that may lead to flaming.
There is a difference between staff opinion and personal opinion. A staff member may hold a different view then the rest of the staff but that does not change the staff's overall opinion. This post, for example, is simply my personal opinion and is not the overall staff opinion to the best of my knowledge.