That's what I'm going to bring in the bloody chat. The RP is getting too strict. Magic doesn't have to be explained... "How do you do that?" "MAGIC!" "How does it work?" "MAGIC!" Now... it's more like "How does it work?" "Well, the energy from magic... blah, blah, blah..." It's not right. It should be magic. Simple as that. If anyone demands explanation? One word: magic. That's it. That's all one needs to explain. For AM fields? If magic is a simple as magic, then AM fields should be as simple as magic.
But yeah... didn't think of that... boycotting the damn thing. It's gonna be a damn flame war in there... most would come from me and Orph. No point in even joining the chat if I'm actually going to argue against the topic at hand in the chat. I'm a tech user, and I rarely used magic, but that doesn't mean I won't defend what magic is and what it's meant to be, to be fucking different. Magic in the end is pretty much unrequested technology. Yeah... boycotting it... and you pretty much can't do much without me in it. I'm a tech user and rely heavily on science, but even I know that I explained magic too much.
Magic is absolute. AM fields are as absolute as magic. End of story.
Explaining is limiting it, Nisorin. If I explain how one thing works, then that means it has to be stuck to how it works. It won't be as flexible. Explaining is pretty much adding rules to one thing, and rules add limits. Magic isn't supposed to be explained, anyway, so why not AM fields, too? They are the counterpart of something that shouldn't be explained, so why should they be explained?
